Scientific guidance and assessment. Evaluation criteria associated with program work

Scientific guidance and assessment. Evaluation criteria associated with program work

The supervisor that is scientific of program work is appointed because of the Department of Sociology, concentrating on the product range of systematic passions of instructors and the amount of scholastic training load.

The main tasks for the manager

The task that is main of manager – advising and monitoring the entire process of utilization of pupil coursework.

The duties associated with the manager include:

– help in selecting the subject regarding the program work plus the development of the work plan;

– performing consultations that are systematic the pupil on problems of work;

– support when you look at the range of research practices;

– advising the pupil regarding the collection of sourced elements of literary works and factual product;

– monitoring the progress of work with conformity aided by the founded plan and intermediate official certification associated with pupil;

– work evaluation.

Evaluation criteria associated with the course work

The criteria that are main the assessment of coursework consist of:

– the correctness associated with reported function and objectives of this work and The content to their compliance of this work;

– self-reliance associated with the author’s method of the disclosure regarding the topic, such as the formula and reason of their approach that is own to research issues;

– persistence and structured presentation of this product, like thequality for the introduction and summary, the partnership and continuity Between the right areas of the task, involving the theoretical and practical components of the research;

– the grade of the analysis as well as the power to utilize the types of medical research, like the quality of analysis for sale in the literature ways to the research regarding the issues in mind;

– The practical need for the program work, like the connection of theoretical positions considered in the ongoing work, with repetition;

– the correctness associated with the utilization of sources, including conformity aided by the guidelines for compiling a listing of sources;

– compliance utilizing the coursework design needs, precision of design, the lack of spelling and errors that are grammatical the written text (especially whenever making use of unique terminology);

– the individual share regarding the writer into the analysis and research of this issue.

Conformity using the guidelines of research ethics

While preparing a program work, special attention is compensated to pupils‘ conformity because of the guidelines of research ethics. In no full situation should plagiarism, falsification of information and „false quoting“ be used.

Even as we mention plagiarism, we suggest direct borrowing without appropriate sources to your printed or electronic sources, previously defended last qualifying works, master’s and dissertations that are doctoral.

We mean to a fake or change the when we say the falsification of data supply information to be able to show the correctness of this summary (confirmation of this theory, etc.), plus the use that is deliberate of false information being a foundation for analysis.

False quote means the presence of links to your supply as soon as the offered supply will not contain such information or suggests an invalid web page.

Detection of ethical breaches leads to evaluation that is poor.

The finding of those violations of expert ethics could be the foundation for reducing markings for program work, as much as grading „unsatisfactory“.

Course tasks are ranked on a five-point scale. The supervisor evaluates the work thinking about the quality regarding the text (in other words. its content, logic and argumentation), the theoretical and methodological amount of work, therefore the completeness associated with source database. Along with the usage and knowledge of the literature on the subject, the correctness associated with formulation and solution for the research issue, the legitimacy and legitimacy regarding the conclusions work, the proper design of this work, along with the quality of message during the protection plus the capability to lead a clinical conversation.